Hello,
On 2016-07-06 15:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 07/06/2016 02:15 PM, weiyj...@163.com wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>
In case of error, the function of_platform_device_create() returns
NULL pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value
check should be replaced with NULL test.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
index 33dcc29..9b23059 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
@@ -1345,8 +1345,8 @@ static int __init exynos_iommu_of_setup(struct
device_node *np)
exynos_iommu_init();
pdev = of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, platform_bus_type.dev_root);
- if (IS_ERR(pdev))
- return PTR_ERR(pdev);
+ if (!pdev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
/*
* use the first registered sysmmu device for performing
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
Which in case of first sysmmu device and of_platform_device_create()
failure will lead to NULL pointer exception, so I think it is
appropriate to:
Fixes: 8ed55c812fa8 ("iommu/exynos: Init from dt-specific callback
instead of initcall")
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Thanks for spotting this issue.
Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
