Hi Sricharan,
On 2016-08-09 00:49, Sricharan R wrote:
> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
>
> Failures to look up an IOMMU when parsing the DT iommus property need to
> be handled separately from the .of_xlate() failures to support deferred
> probing.
>
> The lack of a registered IOMMU can be caused by the lack of a driver for
> the IOMMU, the IOMMU device probe not having been performed yet, having
> been deferred, or having failed.
>
> The first case occurs when the device tree describes the bus master and
> IOMMU topology correctly but no device driver exists for the IOMMU yet
> or the device driver has not been compiled in. Return NULL, the caller
> will configure the device without an IOMMU.
>
> The second and third cases are handled by deferring the probe of the bus
> master device which will eventually get reprobed after the IOMMU.
>
> The last case is currently handled by deferring the probe of the bus
> master device as well. A mechanism to either configure the bus master
> device without an IOMMU or to fail the bus master device probe depending
> on whether the IOMMU is optional or mandatory would be a good
> enhancement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
It is a common practice to briefly describe here what has been changed
since the original patch if you have modified it (see commit
855ed04a3758b205e84b269f92d26ab36ed8e2f7 for the example).
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricha...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/of/device.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> index 4c4219d..3994cf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct
device *dev,
> {
> struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec;
> struct device_node *np = NULL;
> - struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL;
> + const struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL;
> int idx = 0;
>
> if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> @@ -189,8 +189,21 @@ const struct iommu_ops
*of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
> np = iommu_spec.np;
> ops = of_iommu_get_ops(np);
>
> - if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate || ops->of_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec))
> + if (!ops) {
> + const struct of_device_id *oid;
> +
> + oid = of_match_node(&__iommu_of_table, np);
> + ops = oid ? ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER) : NULL;
> goto err_put_node;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ops->of_xlate || ops->of_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec)) {
> + ops = NULL;
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
> +
> + if (ops->add_device)
> + ops = ops->add_device(dev) ? ops : NULL;
ops->add_device() returns ZERO on success or error code on failure, so
the above
line should be changed to:
ops = (ops->add_device(dev) == 0) ? ops : NULL;
> of_node_put(np);
> idx++;
> @@ -200,7 +213,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct
device *dev,
>
> err_put_node:
> of_node_put(np);
> - return NULL;
> + return ops;
> }
>
> void __init of_iommu_init(void)
> @@ -211,7 +224,7 @@ void __init of_iommu_init(void)
> for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, matches, &match) {
> const of_iommu_init_fn init_fn = match->data;
>
> - if (init_fn(np))
> + if (init_fn && init_fn(np))
> pr_err("Failed to initialise IOMMU %s\n",
> of_node_full_name(np));
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
> index e1fad50..92e02dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ int of_dma_configure_ops(struct device *dev,
struct device_node *np)
> coherent ? " " : " not ");
>
> iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev, np);
> + if (IS_ERR(iommu))
> + return PTR_ERR(iommu);
> dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sbehind an iommu\n",
> iommu ? " " : " not ");
>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
