Hi Robin, On 01/17/2018 08:18 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -91,7 +92,6 @@ struct rk_iommu { void __iomem **bases; int num_mmu; int *irq;Nit: irq seems to be redundant now as well.
oops, will fix it.
- int num_irq; bool reset_disabled; struct iommu_device iommu; struct list_head node; /* entry in rk_iommu_domain.iommus */ @@ -830,13 +830,6 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, iommu->domain = domain; - for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) { - ret = devm_request_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq[i], rk_iommu_irq, - IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), iommu); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_mmu; i++) { rk_iommu_write(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_DTE_ADDR, rk_domain->dt_dma); @@ -885,9 +878,6 @@ static void rk_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, } rk_iommu_disable_stall(iommu); - for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) - devm_free_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq[i], iommu); - iommu->domain = NULL; dev_dbg(dev, "Detached from iommu domain\n"); @@ -1138,7 +1128,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct rk_iommu *iommu; struct resource *res; int num_res = pdev->num_resources; - int err, i; + int err, i, irq, num_irq; iommu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu), GFP_KERNEL); if (!iommu) @@ -1165,23 +1155,17 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (iommu->num_mmu == 0) return PTR_ERR(iommu->bases[0]); - iommu->num_irq = platform_irq_count(pdev); - if (iommu->num_irq < 0) - return iommu->num_irq; - if (iommu->num_irq == 0) - return -ENXIO; - - iommu->irq = devm_kcalloc(dev, iommu->num_irq, sizeof(*iommu->irq), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!iommu->irq) - return -ENOMEM; - - for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) { - iommu->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); - if (iommu->irq[i] < 0) { - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ, %d\n", iommu->irq[i]); + num_irq = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);To follow up on the other reply, I'm not sure you really need to count the IRQs beforehand at all - you're going to be looping through platform_get_irq() and handling errors anyway, so you may as well just start at 0 and keep going until -ENOENT (or use platform_get_resource() to double-check whether an index should be valid, as we do in arm_smmu).
ok, will do that.
Otherwise, it looks like everything that the IRQ handler needs in the iommu struct (dev, num_mmu and bases) is already initialised by this point, so we should be OK with respect to races.
ok.
Robin.
_______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
