On 2018-01-19 05:27, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
Hi Sinan,
On 19/01/18 04:52, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Hi Jean-Philippe,
On 10/6/2017 9:31 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
/**
+ * iommu_process_bind_device - Bind a process address space to a
device
+ * @dev: the device
+ * @task: the process to bind
+ * @pasid: valid address where the PASID will be stored
+ * @flags: bond properties (IOMMU_PROCESS_BIND_*)
+ *
+ * Create a bond between device and task, allowing the device to
access the
+ * process address space using the returned PASID.
+ *
+ * On success, 0 is returned and @pasid contains a valid ID.
Otherwise, an error
+ * is returned.
+ */
+int iommu_process_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct task_struct
*task,
+ int *pasid, int flags)
This API doesn't play nice with endpoint device drivers that have
PASID limitations.
The AMD driver seems to have PASID limitations per product that are
not being
advertised in the PCI capability.
device_iommu_pasid_init()
{
pasid_limit = min_t(unsigned int,
(unsigned int)(1 <<
kfd->device_info->max_pasid_bits),
iommu_info.max_pasids);
/*
* last pasid is used for kernel queues doorbells
* in the future the last pasid might be used for a kernel
thread.
*/
pasid_limit = min_t(unsigned int,
pasid_limit,
kfd->doorbell_process_limit - 1);
}
kfd->device_info->max_pasid_bits seems to contain per device
limitations.
Would you be willing to extend the API so that the requester can
impose some limit
on the PASID value that is getting allocated.
Good point. Following the feedback for this series, next version adds
another public function:
int iommu_sva_device_init(struct device *dev, int features);
that has to be called by the device driver before any bind(). The
intent
is to let some IOMMU drivers initialize PASID tables and other features
lazily, only if the device driver actually intends to use them. Maybe I
could change this function to:
int iommu_sva_device_init(struct device *dev, int features, unsigned
int
max_pasid);
@features is a bitmask telling what the device driver needs (PASID
and/or
page faults). If features has IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_PASID set, then device
driver
can set a max_pasid limit, that we'd store in our private device-iommu
data. If max_pasid is 0, then we'd use the PCI limit.
Yes, this should work.
Thanks,
Jean
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
