On 08/13/2018 04:39 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
On 13/08/18 05:30 PM, Kit Chow wrote:
In arch/x86/include/asm/page.h, there is the following comment in
regards to validating the virtual address.
/*
* virt_to_page(kaddr) returns a valid pointer if and only if
* virt_addr_valid(kaddr) returns true.
*/
#define virt_to_page(kaddr) pfn_to_page(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
So it looks like the validation by virt_addr_valid was somehow dropped
from the virt_to_page code path. Does anyone have any ideas what
happended to it?
I don't think it was ever validated (though I haven't been around long
enough to say for certain). What the comment is saying is that you
shouldn't rely on virt_to_page() unless you know virt_addr_valid() is
true (which in most cases you can without the extra check). virt_to_page
is meant to be really fast so adding an extra validation would probably
be a significant performance regression for the entire kernel.
The fact that this can happen through dma_map_single() is non-ideal at
best. It assumes the caller is mapping regular memory and doesn't check
this at all. It may make sense to fix that but I think people expect
dma_map_single() to be as fast as possible as well...
Perhaps include the validation with some debug turned on?
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
