On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:52:58AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:37:15PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > + if (!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size) ||
> > > > + swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE) {
> > > > + trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, dma_addr, size,
> > > > swiotlb_force);
> > > > + dma_addr = swiotlb_bounce_page(dev, &phys, size, dir,
> > > > attrs);
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > FWIW I prefer the inverse condition and early return of the original code
> > > here, which also then allows a tail-call to swiotlb_bounce_page() (and
> > > saves
> > > a couple of lines), but it's no biggie.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
> >
> > I agree with Robin - it certainly makes it easier to read.
> >
> > With that small change:
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
>
> So I did this edit, and in this patch it does indeed look much cleaner.
> But in patch 9 we introduce the cache maintainance, and have to invert
> the condition again if we don't want a goto mess:
Right. In which case please leave this patch as it is. And please
plaster the Reviewed-by on the patch. Thank you!
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
