ping?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:22:59AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The CXL code never even looks at the dma mask, so there is no good
> reason for this sanity check. Remove it because it gets in the way
> of the dma ops refactoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c | 12 ------------
> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> index 7908633d9204..49da2f744bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/vphb.c
> @@ -11,17 +11,6 @@
> #include <misc/cxl.h>
> #include "cxl.h"
>
> -static int cxl_dma_set_mask(struct pci_dev *pdev, u64 dma_mask)
> -{
> - if (dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) {
> - pr_info("%s only 64bit DMA supported on CXL", __func__);
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - *(pdev->dev.dma_mask) = dma_mask;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int cxl_pci_probe_mode(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> return PCI_PROBE_NORMAL;
> @@ -220,7 +209,6 @@ static struct pci_controller_ops cxl_pci_controller_ops =
> .reset_secondary_bus = cxl_pci_reset_secondary_bus,
> .setup_msi_irqs = cxl_setup_msi_irqs,
> .teardown_msi_irqs = cxl_teardown_msi_irqs,
> - .dma_set_mask = cxl_dma_set_mask,
> };
>
> int cxl_pci_vphb_add(struct cxl_afu *afu)
> --
> 2.19.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
---end quoted text---
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
