On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:28:28PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Because if iommu_map() only gets called at PAGE_SIZE granularity, then the 
> IOMMU PTEs will be created at PAGE_SIZE (or smaller) granularity, so any 
> effort to get higher-order allocations matching larger IOMMU block sizes is 
> wasted, and we may as well have just done this:
>
>       for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>               struct page *page = alloc_page(gfp);
>               ...
>               iommu_map(..., page_to_phys(page), PAGE_SIZE, ...);
>       }

True.  I've dropped this patch.

> Really, it's a shame we have to split huge pages for the CPU remap, since 
> in the common case the CPU MMU will have a matching block size, but IIRC 
> there was something in vmap() or thereabouts that explicitly chokes on 
> them.

That just needs a volunteer to fix the implementation, as there is no
fundamental reason not to remap large pages.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to