Should this one go stable 4.14/4.19 too?
On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 16:00 +0200, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote: > > From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com> > > Fix issue with the entry indexing in the sg frame cleanup code being > off-by-1. This problem showed up when doing some basic iperf tests and > manifested in traffic coming to a halt. > > Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com> > Acked-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bu...@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c > index daede7272768..40420edc9ce6 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c > @@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *dpaa_cleanup_tx_fd(const struct > dpaa_priv *priv, > qm_sg_entry_get_len(&sgt[0]), dma_dir); > > /* remaining pages were mapped with skb_frag_dma_map() */ > - for (i = 1; i < nr_frags; i++) { > + for (i = 1; i <= nr_frags; i++) { > WARN_ON(qm_sg_entry_is_ext(&sgt[i])); > > dma_unmap_page(dev, qm_sg_addr(&sgt[i]), > -- > 2.17.1 > _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu