Em Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:54:10 +0200
Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> escreveu:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 07:40:07AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Personally, I don't care much with monospaced fonts on this table. After
> > all, if I want to see it monospaced, I can simply click at the
> > "View page source" at the browser, and it will display the file as a
> > plain old monospaced text file.
>
> Goes to show why kernel people wouldn't want to look at that in
> the browser. Long hex numbers are hard to read as it is - that's
> why there's even the 4-digit separator in some docs, for example:
> 0xffff_ffff_8100_0000.
IMHO, even the 0x and _ would make it harder to read. This is a way
more easy for my eyes:
ffff ffff 8100 0000
> Not having it monospaced makes the whole thing even less readable.
Yeah, I see your point and agree with it.
Just saying that, if all I want is to check if addresses that start
with ffff80 belongs to the guard hole, or just to copy a value from
a table into some C code, the font doesn't matter much, and, if
I care, a simple click would show it in monospaced fonts.
Looking from your PoV, something like:
|ffffffff80000000 | -2 GB | ffffffff9fffffff | 512 MB | kernel text
mapping, mapped to physical address 0 |
is very hard to be parsed by a human eye, even with monospaced fonts.
In order to make it easier, I would replace it by:
|ffff ffff 8000 0000 | -2 GB | ffff ffff 9fff ffff | 512 MB | kernel text
mapping, mapped to physical address 0 |
>
> That's why it is important for the markup not to get in the way of
> people looking at those files in an editor.
Fully agreed. the markups should make things easier and not
harder for people to read its contents.
Thanks,
Mauro
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
