Hi Jean-Philippe,
On 5/1/19 12:38 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On 08/04/2019 13:18, Eric Auger wrote:
>> +int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
>> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(!domain->ops->cache_invalidate))
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + ret = domain->ops->cache_invalidate(domain, dev, inv_info);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>
> Nit: you don't really need ret
>
> The UAPI looks good to me, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com>
Just to make sure, do you accept changes proposed by Jacob in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/29/659 ie.
- the addition of NR_IOMMU_INVAL_GRANU in enum iommu_inv_granularity and
- the addition of NR_IOMMU_CACHE_TYPE
Thanks
Eric
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
