On 03/06/2019 22:59, Jacob Pan wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:57:45 +0100 > Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com> wrote: > >> Allow device drivers and VFIO to get notified on IOMMU translation >> fault, and handle recoverable faults (PCI PRI). Several series require >> this API (Intel VT-d and Arm SMMUv3 nested support, as well as the >> generic host SVA implementation). >> >> Changes since v1 [1]: >> * Allocate iommu_param earlier, in iommu_probe_device(). >> * Pass struct iommu_fault to fault handlers, instead of the >> iommu_fault_event wrapper. >> * Removed unused iommu_fault_event::iommu_private. >> * Removed unnecessary iommu_page_response::addr. >> * Added iommu_page_response::version, which would allow to introduce a >> new incompatible iommu_page_response structure (as opposed to just >> adding a flag + field). >> >> [1] [PATCH 0/4] iommu: Add device fault reporting API >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190523180613.55049-1-jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com/ >> >> Jacob Pan (3): >> driver core: Add per device iommu param >> iommu: Introduce device fault data >> iommu: Introduce device fault report API >> >> Jean-Philippe Brucker (1): >> iommu: Add recoverable fault reporting >> > This interface meet the need for vt-d, just one more comment on 2/4. Do > you want to add Co-developed-by you for the three patches from me?
I'm fine without it, I don't think it adds much to the Signed-off-by, which is required Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
