On 11/06/2019 11:19, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> +static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>> + struct arm_smmu_master *master)
>> +{
>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> + struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>>
>> - cfg->cdptr[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
>> + cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
>> + cfg->s1cdmax = master->ssid_bits;
>> + return arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table, 1 <<
>> cfg->s1cdmax);
>> +}
>>
>> - val = cfg->cd.ttbr & CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK;
>> - cfg->cdptr[1] = cpu_to_le64(val);
>
> Hmm. Diff was having a field day in trying to make the patch as unreadable as
> possible..
Ugh, yes. This part is a bit more readable with --patience, but I'll
also try to split the patch as you suggest
Thanks,
Jean
