On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:00:11PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
> 
> Some subsystems, such as pinctrl, allow continuing to defer probe
> indefinitely. This is useful for devices that depend on resources
> provided by devices that are only probed after the init stage.
> 
> One example of this can be seen on Tegra, where the DPAUX hardware
> contains pinmuxing controls for pins that it shares with an I2C
> controller. The I2C controller is typically used for communication
> with a monitor over HDMI (DDC). However, other instances of the I2C
> controller are used to access system critical components, such as a
> PMIC. The I2C controller driver will therefore usually be a builtin
> driver, whereas the DPAUX driver is part of the display driver that
> is loaded from a module to avoid bloating the kernel image with all
> of the DRM/KMS subsystem.
> 
> In this particular case the pins used by this I2C/DDC controller
> become accessible very late in the boot process. However, since the
> controller is only used in conjunction with display, that's not an
> issue.
> 
> Unfortunately the driver core currently outputs a warning message
> when a device fails to get the pinctrl before the end of the init
> stage. That can be confusing for the user because it may sound like
> an unwanted error occurred, whereas it's really an expected and
> harmless situation.
> 
> In order to eliminate this warning, this patch allows callers of the
> driver_deferred_probe_check_state() helper to specify that they want
> to continue deferring probe, regardless of whether we're past the
> init stage or not. All of the callers of that function are updated
> for the new signature, but only the pinctrl subsystem passes a true
> value in the new persist parameter if appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - pass persist flag via flags parameter to make the function call easier
>   to understand
> 
>  drivers/base/dd.c            | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c |  9 +++++----
>  include/linux/device.h       | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 0df9b4461766..0399a6f6c479 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -238,23 +238,32 @@ __setup("deferred_probe_timeout=", 
> deferred_probe_timeout_setup);
>  /**
>   * driver_deferred_probe_check_state() - Check deferred probe state
>   * @dev: device to check
> + * @flags: Flags used to control the behavior of this function. Drivers can
> + *   set the DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST flag to indicate that they want to
> + *   keep trying to probe after built-in drivers have had a chance to probe.
> + *   This is useful for built-in drivers that rely on resources provided by
> + *   modular drivers.
>   *
>   * Returns -ENODEV if init is done and all built-in drivers have had a chance
> - * to probe (i.e. initcalls are done), -ETIMEDOUT if deferred probe debug
> - * timeout has expired, or -EPROBE_DEFER if none of those conditions are met.
> + * to probe (i.e. initcalls are done) and unless the 
> DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST
> + * flag is set, -ETIMEDOUT if deferred probe debug timeout has expired, or
> + * -EPROBE_DEFER if none of those conditions are met.
>   *
>   * Drivers or subsystems can opt-in to calling this function instead of 
> directly
>   * returning -EPROBE_DEFER.
>   */
> -int driver_deferred_probe_check_state(struct device *dev)
> +int driver_deferred_probe_check_state(struct device *dev, unsigned long 
> flags)
>  {
>       if (initcalls_done) {
>               if (!deferred_probe_timeout) {
>                       dev_WARN(dev, "deferred probe timeout, ignoring 
> dependency");
>                       return -ETIMEDOUT;
>               }
> -             dev_warn(dev, "ignoring dependency for device, assuming no 
> driver");
> -             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +             if ((flags & DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST) == 0) {
> +                     dev_warn(dev, "ignoring dependency for device, assuming 
> no driver");
> +                     return -ENODEV;
> +             }
>       }
>       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 33c30c1e6a30..6198c6a30fe2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ static int __genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, 
> struct device *base_dev,
>               mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
>               dev_dbg(dev, "%s() failed to find PM domain: %ld\n",
>                       __func__, PTR_ERR(pd));
> -             return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(base_dev);
> +             return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(base_dev, 0);

Again, I said no odd flags for functions, how is anyone supposed to know
what "0" means here?

You just swapped a boolean for a bitmapped flag, right?  That did not
make the api any easier to understand at all.

> +/*
> + * This can be use to continue to defer probe after the init stage and after
> + * all the built-in drivers have had a chance to probe. This is useful if a
> + * built-in driver requires resources provided by a modular driver.
> + *
> + * One such example is the pinctrl subsystem, where for example the DPAUX
> + * hardware on Tegra provides pinmuxing controls for pins shared between 
> DPAUX
> + * and I2C controllers. Only a subset of I2C controllers need the DPAUX
> + * pinmuxing, and some I2C controllers are used during early boot for 
> critical
> + * tasks (such as communicating with the system PMIC). The I2C controllers
> + * that don't share pins with a DPAUX block will want to be driven by a 
> built-
> + * in driver to make sure they are available early on.
> + */
> +#define DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST (1 << 0)

In the future, please always use BIT() for stuff like this.

Anyway, this isn't ok, do it correctly please, like I asked for the
first time...

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to