On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:21:51 +0800 Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM > > > > Maybe move them to intel-svm.c instead? that's where the bulk > > of the svm support is? > > I think this is a generic PASID allocator for guest IOMMU although > vSVA is currently the only consumer. Instead of making it SVM > specific, I'd like to suggest moving it to intel-pasid.c and replace > the @svm parameter with a void * one in intel_ioasid_free(). make sense to use void*, no need to tie that to svm bind data type. In terms of location, perhaps we can move if we have more consumers of custom allocator? _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
