On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:02 AM John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com> wrote: > > On 30/11/2019 06:02, Cong Wang wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:24 AM John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 29/11/2019 00:48, Cong Wang wrote: > >>> If the maganize is empty, iova_magazine_free_pfns() should > >> > >> magazine > > > > Good catch! > > > >> > >>> be a nop, however it misses the case of mag->size==0. So we > >>> should just call iova_magazine_empty(). > >>> > >>> This should reduce the contention on iovad->iova_rbtree_lock > >>> a little bit. > >>> > >>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org> > >>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c > >>> index cb473ddce4cf..184d4c0e20b5 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c > >>> @@ -797,13 +797,23 @@ static void iova_magazine_free(struct iova_magazine > >>> *mag) > >>> kfree(mag); > >>> } > >>> > >>> +static bool iova_magazine_full(struct iova_magazine *mag) > >>> +{ > >>> + return (mag && mag->size == IOVA_MAG_SIZE); > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> +static bool iova_magazine_empty(struct iova_magazine *mag) > >>> +{ > >>> + return (!mag || mag->size == 0); > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> static void > >>> iova_magazine_free_pfns(struct iova_magazine *mag, struct iova_domain > >>> *iovad) > >>> { > >>> unsigned long flags; > >>> int i; > >>> > >>> - if (!mag) > >>> + if (iova_magazine_empty(mag)) > >> > >> The only hot path we this call is > >> __iova_rcache_insert()->iova_magazine_free_pfns(mag_to_free) and > >> mag_to_free is full in this case, so I am sure how the additional check > >> helps, right? > > > > This is what I mean by "a little bit" in changelog, did you miss it or > > misunderstand it? :) > > I was concerned that in the fastpath we actually make things very > marginally slower by adding a check which will fail.
The check is done without any locking, so it is cheap. And it is a common pattern that we do a check without lock and do a second same check with lock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-checked_locking Thanks. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu