On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Right, I can see the appeal. I still like having a single mmu notifier per > mm because it ensures we allocate a single PASID per mm (as required by > x86). I suppose one alternative is to maintain a hashtable of mm->pasid, > to avoid iterating over all bonds during allocation.
Given that the PASID is a pretty generic and important concept can we just add it directly to the mm_struct and allocate it lazily once we first need it? _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
