On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 04:47:17PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 10:19 -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote: > > Hi Christoph > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:43:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Can you please lift the untrusted flag into struct device? It really > > > isn't a PCI specific concept, and we should not have code poking into > > > pci_dev all over the iommu code. > > > > Just for clarification: All IOMMU's today mostly pertain to only PCI devices > > and for devices that aren't PCI like HPET for instance we give a PCI > > identifier. Facilities like ATS for instance require the platform to have > > an IOMMU. > > > > what additional problems does moving this to struct device solve? > > Even the Intel IOMMU supports ACPI devices for which there is no struct > pci_dev; only a B/D/F in the ANDD record indicating which entry in the > context table to use.
Yes, spaced out :-).. just don't work on those platforms on a daily basis and its easy to forget :-( _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
