From: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
dummy_numa_init() loops over memblock.memory and passes nid=0 to
numa_add_memblk() which essentially wraps memblock_set_node(). However,
memblock_set_node() can cope with entire memory span itself, so the loop
over memblock.memory regions is redundant.
Replace the loop with a single call to memblock_set_node() to the entire
memory.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index aafcee3e3f7e..0cbdbcc885fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -423,19 +423,16 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
*/
static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
{
+ phys_addr_t start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
+ phys_addr_t end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
int ret;
- struct memblock_region *mblk;
if (numa_off)
pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
- pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
- memblock_start_of_DRAM(), memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1);
-
- for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) {
- ret = numa_add_memblk(0, mblk->base, mblk->base + mblk->size);
- if (!ret)
- continue;
+ pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", start, end - 1);
+ ret = numa_add_memblk(0, start, end);
+ if (ret) {
pr_err("NUMA init failed\n");
return ret;
}
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
