Hi Eric,

On 2020/11/16 19:00, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch adds the VFIO_IOMMU_SET_MSI_BINDING ioctl which aim
> to (un)register the guest MSI binding to the host. This latter
> then can use those stage 1 bindings to build a nested stage
> binding targeting the physical MSIs.
[...]

> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_set_msi_binding(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +                                         unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +     struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_msi_binding msi_binding;
> +     unsigned long minsz;
> +     int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +     minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_msi_binding,
> +                         size);
> +
> +     if (copy_from_user(&msi_binding, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> +             return -EFAULT;
> +
> +     if (msi_binding.argsz < minsz)
> +             return -EINVAL;
We can check BIND and UNBIND are not set simultaneously, just like 
VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE.

> +
> +     if (msi_binding.flags == VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_MSI) {
> +             vfio_unbind_msi(iommu, msi_binding.iova);
> +             ret = 0;
> +     } else if (msi_binding.flags == VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_MSI) {
> +             ret = vfio_bind_msi(iommu, msi_binding.iova,
> +                                 msi_binding.gpa, msi_binding.size);
> +     }
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +

Thanks,
Keqian
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to