When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should really be no allocations of
io_tlb_nslabs to occur since we are not going to use those slabs. If a
platform was somehow setting swiotlb_no_force and a later call to
swiotlb_init() was to be made we would still be proceeding with
allocating the default SWIOTLB size (64MB), whereas if swiotlb=noforce
was set on the kernel command line we would have only allocated 2KB.

This would be inconsistent and the point of initializing io_tlb_nslabs
to 1, was to avoid hitting the test for io_tlb_nslabs being 0/not
initialized.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index c10e855a03bc..526c8321b76f 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -121,12 +121,10 @@ setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str)
        }
        if (*str == ',')
                ++str;
-       if (!strcmp(str, "force")) {
+       if (!strcmp(str, "force"))
                swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_FORCE;
-       } else if (!strcmp(str, "noforce")) {
+       else if (!strcmp(str, "noforce"))
                swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
-               io_tlb_nslabs = 1;
-       }
 
        return 0;
 }
@@ -284,6 +282,9 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose)
        unsigned char *vstart;
        unsigned long bytes;
 
+       if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE)
+               goto out;
+
        if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
                io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
                io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
@@ -302,6 +303,7 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose)
                io_tlb_start = 0;
        }
        pr_warn("Cannot allocate buffer");
+out:
        no_iotlb_memory = true;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to