s/tranfers/transfers/
s/maxium/maximum/
s/previouly/previously/
s/broked/broken/
s/embedds/embeds/ .... three different places.

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhas...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
index 30ae36124b1d..02c09532a9e4 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
@@ -374,11 +374,11 @@ static int atc_get_bytes_left(struct dma_chan *chan, 
dma_cookie_t cookie)
                 * a second time. If the two consecutive read values of the DSCR
                 * are the same then we assume both refers to the very same
                 * child descriptor as well as the CTRLA value read inbetween
-                * does. For cyclic tranfers, the assumption is that a full loop
+                * does. For cyclic transfers, the assumption is that a full 
loop
                 * is "not so fast".
                 * If the two DSCR values are different, we read again the CTRLA
                 * then the DSCR till two consecutive read values from DSCR are
-                * equal or till the maxium trials is reach.
+                * equal or till the maximum trials is reach.
                 * This algorithm is very unlikely not to find a stable value 
for
                 * DSCR.
                 */
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static int atc_get_bytes_left(struct dma_chan *chan, 
dma_cookie_t cookie)

                        /*
                         * DSCR has changed inside the DMA controller, so the
-                        * previouly read value of CTRLA may refer to an already
+                        * previously read value of CTRLA may refer to an 
already
                         * processed descriptor hence could be outdated.
                         * We need to update ctrla to match the current
                         * descriptor.
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void atc_handle_error(struct at_dma_chan *atchan)
        spin_lock_irqsave(&atchan->lock, flags);
        /*
         * The descriptor currently at the head of the active list is
-        * broked. Since we don't have any way to report errors, we'll
+        * broken. Since we don't have any way to report errors, we'll
         * just have to scream loudly and try to carry on.
         */
        bad_desc = atc_first_active(atchan);
@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ atc_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, 
dma_addr_t src,
                atc_desc_chain(&first, &prev, desc);
        }

-       /* First descriptor of the chain embedds additional information */
+       /* First descriptor of the chain embeds additional information */
        first->txd.cookie = -EBUSY;
        first->total_len = len;

@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ atc_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct 
scatterlist *sgl,
        /* set end-of-link to the last link descriptor of list*/
        set_desc_eol(prev);

-       /* First descriptor of the chain embedds additional information */
+       /* First descriptor of the chain embeds additional information */
        first->txd.cookie = -EBUSY;
        first->total_len = total_len;

@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ atc_prep_dma_cyclic(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
buf_addr, size_t buf_len,
        /* lets make a cyclic list */
        prev->lli.dscr = first->txd.phys;

-       /* First descriptor of the chain embedds additional information */
+       /* First descriptor of the chain embeds additional information */
        first->txd.cookie = -EBUSY;
        first->total_len = buf_len;

--
2.26.3

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to