Replace a couple of calls to memcpy() with simple assignments in order
to fix the following out-of-bounds warning:

drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c:1198:4: warning: 'memcpy' offset [25, 32] from the 
object at 'desc' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'qw2' with type 
'long long unsigned int' at offset 16 [-Warray-bounds]

The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a
couple of struct members adjacent to each other in a single call to
memcpy(). This causes a legitimate compiler warning because memcpy()
overruns the length of &desc.qw2 and &resp.qw2, respectively.

This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds
and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines
on memcpy().

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
 - Fix another instance of this same issue in prq_event_thread().

 drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 5165cea90421..332365ec3195 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -1020,9 +1020,10 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
                        resp.qw2 = 0;
                        resp.qw3 = 0;
 
-                       if (req->priv_data_present)
-                               memcpy(&resp.qw2, req->priv_data,
-                                      sizeof(req->priv_data));
+                       if (req->priv_data_present) {
+                               resp.qw2 = req->priv_data[0];
+                               resp.qw3 = req->priv_data[1];
+                       }
                        qi_submit_sync(iommu, &resp, 1, 0);
                }
 prq_advance:
@@ -1194,9 +1195,10 @@ int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev,
                desc.qw1 = QI_PGRP_IDX(prm->grpid) | QI_PGRP_LPIG(last_page);
                desc.qw2 = 0;
                desc.qw3 = 0;
-               if (private_present)
-                       memcpy(&desc.qw2, prm->private_data,
-                              sizeof(prm->private_data));
+               if (private_present) {
+                       desc.qw2 = prm->private_data[0];
+                       desc.qw3 = prm->private_data[1];
+               }
 
                qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
        }
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to