On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 06:37:26AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Jason Gunthorpe > > Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 9:05 PM > > > > > > > > > > 3) Device accepts any PASIDs from the guest. No > > > > vPASID/pPASID translation is possible. (classic vfio_pci) > > > > 4) Device accepts any PASID from the guest and has an > > > > internal vPASID/pPASID translation (enhanced vfio_pci) > > > > > > what is enhanced vfio_pci? In my writing this is for mdev > > > which doesn't support ENQCMD > > > > This is a vfio_pci that mediates some element of the device interface > > to communicate the vPASID/pPASID table to the device, using Max's > > series for vfio_pci drivers to inject itself into VFIO. > > > > For instance a device might send a message through the PF that the VF > > has a certain vPASID/pPASID translation table. This would be useful > > for devices that cannot use ENQCMD but still want to support migration > > and thus need vPASID. > > I still don't quite get. If it's a PCI device why is PASID translation > required? > Just delegate the per-RID PASID space to user as type-3 then migrating the > vPASID space is just straightforward.
This is only possible if we get rid of the global pPASID allocation (honestly is my preference as it makes the HW a lot simpler) Without vPASID the migration would need pPASID's on the RID that are guarenteed free. Jason _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
