On 04-08-2021 03:26, Wei Liu wrote:
>>>     struct iommu_domain domain;
>>> @@ -774,6 +784,41 @@ static struct iommu_device 
>>> *hv_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>>>     if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
>>>             return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>>  
>>> +   /*
>>> +    * Skip the PCI device specified in `pci_devs_to_skip`. This is a
>>> +    * temporary solution until we figure out a way to extract information
>>> +    * from the hypervisor what devices it is already using.
>>> +    */
>>> +   if (pci_devs_to_skip && *pci_devs_to_skip) {
>>> +           int pos = 0;
>>> +           int parsed;
>>> +           int segment, bus, slot, func;
>>> +           struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>> +
>>> +           do {
>>> +                   parsed = 0;
>>> +
>>> +                   sscanf(pci_devs_to_skip + pos,
>>> +                           " (%x:%x:%x.%x) %n",
>>> +                           &segment, &bus, &slot, &func, &parsed);
>>> +
>>> +                   if (parsed <= 0)
>>> +                           break;
>>> +
>>> +                   if (pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) == segment &&
>>> +                           pdev->bus->number == bus &&
>>> +                           PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == slot &&
>>> +                           PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn) == func)
>>> +                   {
>>> +                           dev_info(dev, "skipped by MSHV IOMMU\n");
>>> +                           return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> +                   }
>>> +
>>> +                   pos += parsed;
>>> +
>>> +           } while (pci_devs_to_skip[pos]);
>>
>> Is there a possibility of pci_devs_to_skip + pos > sizeof(pci_devs_to_skip)
>> and also a valid memory ?
> 
> pos should point to the last parsed position. If parsing fails pos does
> not get updated and the code breaks out of the loop. If parsing is
> success pos should point to either the start of next element of '\0'
> (end of string). To me this is good enough.

The point is, hypothetically the address to pci_devs_to_skip + pos can be valid 
address (later to '\0'), and thus there is a possibility, that parsing may not 
fail.
Another, there is also a possibility of sscanf faulting accessing the illegal 
address, if pci_devs_to_skip[pos] turns out to be not NULL or valid address.

> 
>> I would recommend to have a check of size as well before accessing the
>> array content, just to be safer accessing any memory.
>>
> 
> What check do you have in mind?

Something like,
size_t len = strlen(pci_devs_to_skip);
do {

        len -= parsed;
} while (len);

OR

do {
...
        pos += parsed;
} while (pos < len);

Further, I'm also fine with the existing code, if you think this won't break 
and already been taken care. Thanks.

Regards,

~Praveen.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to