Therefore, function arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync() is added to insert
the 'cmd+sync' commands at a time.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei<thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 2433d3c29b49ff2..a5361153ca1d6a4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -858,11 +858,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device
*smmu,
return arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, cmd, 1, false);
}
-static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device
*smmu)
{
return arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, NULL, 0, true);
}
+static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
+{
+ u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
+
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, ent)) {
+ dev_warn(smmu->dev, "ignoring unknown CMDQ opcode 0x%x\n",
+ ent->opcode);
+ return -EINVAL;
Are any of the errors returned from the "issue command" functions actually
consumed? I couldn't see it on mainline code from a brief browse.
I don't think so.
I don't think so either.
Can we actually propagate them?
There does appear to be some places, here's one I found:
arm_smmu_page_response() -> arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(), and
arm_smmu_page_response is set to arm_smmu_ops.page_response, which
returns an int
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
