The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation. Since the default implementation of the
prot_guest_has() matches the s390 implementation of mem_encrypt_active(),
prot_guest_has() does not need to be implemented in s390 (the config
option ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST is not set).
Cc: Heiko Carstens <h...@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <g...@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 2542cbf7e2d1..08a8b96606d7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
-
int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
--
2.32.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
