Reduce maintenance burden of DVSEC query implementation by using the
centralized PCI core implementation.
There are two obvious places to simply drop in the new core
implementation. There remains find_dvsec_from_pos() which would benefit
from using a core implementation. As that change is less trivial it is
reserved for later.
Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <a...@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbar...@linux.ibm.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widaw...@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c | 3 ++-
drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c | 13 +------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
index 9105efcf242a..28b009b46464 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static int get_max_afu_index(struct pci_dev *dev, int
*afu_idx)
int pos;
u32 val;
- pos = find_dvsec_from_pos(dev, OCXL_DVSEC_FUNC_ID, 0);
+ pos = pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM,
+ OCXL_DVSEC_FUNC_ID);
if (!pos)
return -ESRCH;
diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
index a68738f38252..e401a51596b9 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
@@ -33,18 +33,7 @@
static int find_dvsec(struct pci_dev *dev, int dvsec_id)
{
- int vsec = 0;
- u16 vendor, id;
-
- while ((vsec = pci_find_next_ext_capability(dev, vsec,
- OCXL_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC))) {
- pci_read_config_word(dev, vsec + OCXL_DVSEC_VENDOR_OFFSET,
- &vendor);
- pci_read_config_word(dev, vsec + OCXL_DVSEC_ID_OFFSET, &id);
- if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM && id == dvsec_id)
- return vsec;
- }
- return 0;
+ return pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, dvsec_id);
}
static int find_dvsec_afu_ctrl(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 afu_idx)
--
2.33.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
