On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 01:22:03 +0000,
Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> Use __msi_get_vector() and handle the return values to be compatible.
> 
> No functional change intended.

You wish ;-).

[   15.779540] pcieport 0001:00:01.0: AER: request AER IRQ -22 failed

Notice how amusing the IRQ number is?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/msi/msi.c |   25 +++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> @@ -1023,28 +1023,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_free_irq_vectors);
>   */
>  int pci_irq_vector(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr)
>  {
> -     if (dev->msix_enabled) {
> -             struct msi_desc *entry;
> +     int irq = __msi_get_virq(&dev->dev, nr);
>  
> -             for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
> -                     if (entry->msi_index == nr)
> -                             return entry->irq;
> -             }
> -             WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> -             return -EINVAL;
> +     switch (irq) {
> +     case -ENODEV: return !nr ? dev->irq : -EINVAL;
> +     case -ENOENT: return -EINVAL;
>       }
> -
> -     if (dev->msi_enabled) {
> -             struct msi_desc *entry = first_pci_msi_entry(dev);
> -
> -             if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr >= entry->nvec_used))
> -                     return -EINVAL;
> -     } else {
> -             if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr > 0))
> -                     return -EINVAL;
> -     }
> -
> -     return dev->irq + nr;
> +     return irq;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_irq_vector);

I worked around it with the hack below, but I doubt this is the real
thing. portdrv_core.c does complicated things, and I don't completely
understand its logic.

        M.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
index 1f72bc734226..b15278a5fb4b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
@@ -1092,8 +1092,9 @@ int pci_irq_vector(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr)
        int irq = __msi_get_virq(&dev->dev, nr);
 
        switch (irq) {
-       case -ENODEV: return !nr ? dev->irq : -EINVAL;
-       case -ENOENT: return -EINVAL;
+       case -ENOENT:
+       case -ENODEV:
+               return !nr ? dev->irq : -EINVAL;
        }
        return irq;
 }

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to