On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 09:36, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:54:18PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: >> On 2021-11-29 14:42, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > It's actually 0 when the vector cannot be found. >> >> Oh, -1 for my reading comprehension but +1 for my confidence in the patch >> then :) >> >> I'll let Will have the final say over how cautious we really want to be >> here, but as far as I'm concerned it's a welcome cleanup as-is. Ditto for >> patch #32 based on the same reasoning, although I don't have a suitable test >> platform on-hand to sanity-check that one. > > If, as it appears, msi_get_virq() isn't going to fail meaningfully after > we've successfully called platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs() then it sounds > like the patch is fine. Just wanted to check though, as Spring cleaning at > the end of November raised an eyebrow over here :)
Fair enough. Next time I'll name it 'Cleaning the Augean stables' when it's the wrong season. Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu