On Thu, Jan 27 2022 at 18:42, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:38:04PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Against Linus tree please so that the bugfix applies.
>> 
>> > I will fold the following patch into patch #5. The patch #11 (the doc 
>> > patch)
>> > also needs to remove one paragraph talking about refcount.
>> >
>> > So I will send the whole patch set with the following changes:
>> > 1. One new bug fix patch (the above patch)
>
> When I study your above aux_domain bug fix path, I find more aux_domain bugs.
> But then I find aux_domain will be completely removed because all aux_domain
> related callbacks are not called and are dead code (no wonder there are
> so many bugs in aux_domain). Please see this series: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20220124071103.2097118-4-baolu...@linux.intel.com/
> For the series, Baolu confirms that he is "pretty sure that should be part
> of v5.18". And I don't find the series calls any IOASID function after
> removing the aux_domain code.
>
> So that means we don't need to fix those issues in the dead aux_domain
> code any more because it will be completely removed in 5.18, right?
>
> If you agree, I will not include the aux_domain fix patch or any other
> aux_domain fix patches in the up-coming v3. Is that OK?

Fair enough.

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to