On 2022-02-27 14:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
CONFIG_DMA_REMAP is used to build a few helpers around the core
vmalloc code, and to use them in case there is a highmem page in
dma-direct, and to make dma coherent allocations be able to use
non-contiguous pages allocations for DMA allocations in the dma-iommu
layer.

Right now it needs to be explicitly selected by architectures, and
is only done so by architectures that require remapping to deal
with devices that are not DMA coherent.  Make it unconditional for
builds with CONFIG_MMU as it is very little extra code, but makes
it much more likely that large DMA allocations succeed on x86.

This fixes hot plugging a NVMe thunderbolt SSD for me, which tries
to allocate a 1MB buffer that is otherwise hard to obtain due to
memory fragmentation on a heavily used laptop.

Simplifying the maze is most welcome, however one thing stands out...

[...]
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 50f48e9e45987..fe1682fecdd57 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -269,10 +269,10 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
                /*
                 * Depending on the cma= arguments and per-arch setup,
                 * dma_alloc_contiguous could return highmem pages.
-                * Without remapping there is no way to return them here, so
-                * log an error and fail.
+                * Without MMU-based remapping there is no way to return them
+                * here, so log an error and fail.
                 */
-               if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_REMAP)) {
+               if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU)) {
                        dev_info(dev, "Rejecting highmem page from CMA.\n");
                        goto out_free_pages;
                }

Is it even possible to hit this case now? From a quick look, all the architectures defining HIGHMEM either have an explicit dependency on MMU or don't allow deselecting it anyway (plus I don't see how HIGHMEM && !MMU could work in general), so I'm pretty sure this whole chunk should go away now.

With that (or if there *is* some subtle wacky case where PageHighmem() can actually return true for !MMU, a comment to remind us in future),

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>

Cheers,
Robin.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to