On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:

> For the specific case of overriding PCIe No Snoop (which is more problematic
> from an Arm SMMU PoV) when assigning to a VM, would that not be easier
> solved by just having vfio-pci clear the "Enable No Snoop" control bit in
> the endpoint's PCIe capability?

Ideally.

That was rediscussed recently, apparently there are non-compliant
devices and drivers that just ignore the bit. 

Presumably this is why x86 had to move to an IOMMU enforced feature..

> That seems a pretty good summary - I think they're basically all "firmware
> told Linux I'm coherent so I'd better act coherent" cases, but that still
> doesn't necessarily mean that they're *forced* to respect that. One of the
> things on my to-do list is to try adding a DMA_ATTR_NO_SNOOP that can force
> DMA cache maintenance for coherent devices, primarily to hook up in Panfrost
> (where there is a bit of a performance to claw back on the coherent AmLogic
> SoCs by leaving certain buffers non-cacheable).

It would be great to see that in a way that could bring in the few other
GPU drivers doing no-snoop to a formal DMA API instead of hacking
their own stuff with wbinvd calls or whatever.

Thanks,
Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to