Hi Jason,
On 2022/5/12 01:00, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Consolidate pasid programming into dev_set_pasid() then called by both
intel_svm_attach_dev_pasid() and intel_iommu_attach_dev_pasid(), right?
I was only suggesting that really dev_attach_pasid() op is misnamed,
it should be called set_dev_pasid() and act like a set, not a paired
attach/detach - same as the non-PASID ops.
So,
"set_dev_pasid(domain, device, pasid)" equals to dev_attach_pasid()
and
"set_dev_pasid(NULL, device, pasid)" equals to dev_detach_pasid()?
do I understand it right?
Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
