The original x86 sev_alloc() only called set_memory_decrypted() on
memory returned by alloc_pages_node(), so the page order calculation
fell out of that logic. However, the common dma-direct code has several
potential allocators, not all of which are guaranteed to round up the
underlying allocation to a power-of-two size, so carrying over that
calculation for the encryption/decryption size was a mistake. Fix it by
rounding to a *number* of pages, rather than an order.
Until recently there was an even worse interaction with DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
where we could have ended up decrypting part of the next adjacent
vmalloc area, only averted by no architecture actually supporting both
configs at once. Don't ask how I found that one out...
CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c10f07aa27da ("dma/direct: Handle force decryption for DMA coherent
buffers in common code")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
---
kernel/dma/direct.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 9743c6ccce1a..09d78aa40466 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int dma_set_decrypted(struct device *dev, void *vaddr,
size_t size)
{
if (!force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
return 0;
- return set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)vaddr, 1 << get_order(size));
+ return set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)vaddr, PFN_UP(size));
}
static int dma_set_encrypted(struct device *dev, void *vaddr, size_t size)
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int dma_set_encrypted(struct device *dev, void *vaddr,
size_t size)
if (!force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
return 0;
- ret = set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)vaddr, 1 << get_order(size));
+ ret = set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)vaddr, PFN_UP(size));
if (ret)
pr_warn_ratelimited("leaking DMA memory that can't be
re-encrypted\n");
return ret;
--
2.35.3.dirty
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
