On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:20:06PM +0000, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> As so many things, something like Edje seems like it could fit as a
> fancy UI backend in the Vis framework, but it doesn't seem to be at
> all close to what Vis is about.
If I get you correctly the conceptual difference between Edje and Vis
is, that Vis
1) defines semantics for standard variables/types/signals an app might
want to expose
2) builds upon this definition to autogenerate UIs.
So, to clarify the difference, Vis might be a tool that defines a
standard for Edje interface definitions and generates Edje "themes" from
a conforming interface definition.
(I know you have a more sophisticated interface definition language
and you wouldn't want to generate Edje "themes".)
Felix
