Spam detection software, running on the system "cbs.krieg.ag", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
admin for details.
Content preview: Besides all economic issues with two power sucking
devices versus one and gapless widescreen with one psu. My Company
gives me only one crappy 16" TFT with bad resolution (1280x1024). But
lucky me, i saved a 19" CRT from the crap yard a while ago. So thats
what i have to work with. Period. There is no way i can get a 23" TFT,
only because it is the better solution. [...]
Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 2.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.1 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.9028]
--- Begin Message ---
Besides all economic issues with two power sucking devices versus one
and gapless widescreen with one psu.
My Company gives me only one crappy 16" TFT with bad resolution
(1280x1024). But lucky me, i saved a 19" CRT from the crap yard a
while ago.
So thats what i have to work with. Period.
There is no way i can get a 23" TFT, only because it is the better
solution.
I can live with the argument that no one wants to fix/implement
xinerama, because it's a pain, ugly or simply noone is motivated to
implement something he does not use.
Or whatsoever. That's a fair argument.
That i can't use it ore someone thinks it's a bad idea does not mean
i don't want it anymore.
So please don't tell me i don't want it. ;)
Some extra inches penis enlargement are a great thing for me. Moving
my eys is much more intuitive and efficient than switching desktops.
One screen for useless distractions like chat and email, and one to
work on. That is how it worked for me for years. :)
Am 22.01.2007 um 08:34 schrieb Tuomo Valkonen:
On 2007-01-22, Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sometimes it is more economical to purchase two lower-resolution
devices
than one high-resolution device -- at least, that was the case
five years
ago when I changed from a 1600x1200 fuzzy CRT to two 1280x1024
LCDs. I
didn't want to give up the screen space, but a 1600x1200 LCD was
simply
not in my budget at the time.
You don't need that much space. Your field of vision isn't that big at
a "working distance" (as opposed to "monitoring distance") from the
screens, so you could just as well switch a workspace as turn your
head
to the other display. Like I say in the FAQ, the real reason for
multihead is penis enlargment most of the time.
(I'd even bet money that my two LCDs draw
less power than that crummy old CRT. :)
Yes. My 17" TFT is supposed to draw 33W "typically" (whatefer that
means),
while CRTs can easily draw 100W and more. But TFTs may very well
pollute
and waste energy more during their manufacturing. (There's the
issue with
dead pixels, and hence scrap panels for one thing. Any real
statistics on
the proportion of rejected panels?)
--
Tuomo
--- End Message ---
