On 2007-02-27, Sam Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are some very nice high-level libraries available[1] for Haskell > that abstract away even writing the SQL. Of these I've only played with > HaskellDB and was reasonably impressed, but I think a lot has changed > since then and it may be even better.
I actually looked into it today, but: HaskellDB doesn't not seem to support creating new tables on the fly, as it demands a static definition of the database. And I think the way to implement this, would be to have a table for each tag, listing the objects having tha tag. Is INTERSECT how efficient usually, btw.? > I don't think it's implemented anywhere at the moment, but have you > seen the ICFP2005 paper by Iavor Diatchi et. al.[2]? Nope. It would be nice to have something that provides nice and simple bit-level access, though... Or just some low-level language that isn't as painful as C. -- Tuomo
