On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:26:09PM +0300, Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:53:42AM +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > Now maybe Tuomo has got his own reasons not to want to use a CVS to > > keep tracks of the developement evolutions but I can't really see which > > one ;) > > I use CVS and e.g. the ChangeLog is generated from specifically marked > important CVS log message. But, even if I wanted to, I can't give access > to the repository on my computer. For reasons not using a public CVS > service, see <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00366.html>.
Honestly, I don't think offering public read-only CVS is any more a patent liability than distributing source code in tarballs. Why not offer an rsync:// plug to your local repository and have `somebody' mirror that elsewhere, if you are unable to offer a cvspserver? Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL
