Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Michael Denio wrote: > > > that fixed it. I've got Redhat Advanced Server ehre with GCC 2.96. > > I'm guessing that it is an error during the -Os optimization. > > GCC 2.96 is broken. Don't use it.
Borken is not the right term IMO. Unsupported would be better. What's more gcc 2.96 is the first "unofficial" version really standard compliant so ... What is sure is that I agree with the fact not to use this release ;) I prefer using my old 2.95 until gcc 3.x becomes stable enough to be used at production level. For now, all I had with gcc 3.x is shit with optimization and so I won't recommend its use either. So the last alternative is to keep gcc 2.95 which has been really stabilized, tested, what's other ... zeDek -- "Intel engineering seem to have misheard Intel marekting strategy. The phrase was "Divide and conquer" not "Divide and cook up" Alan Cox
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
