On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:44:41AM +0300, Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:30:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > overloading the binding function that way is clearly ugly > Not necessarily if you think of them as functions that "patch" > the existing bindings...
Ok, took a closer look at the patch and it isn't what I thought. Passing a nil function would be a clean way to remove single bindings. -- Tuomo
