On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > The patch doesn't seem to fix anything if va_copy isn't > available.
Correct. > Maybe I should just start requiring C99 again > or would just passing pointer to the original va_list > instead of a va_list as a function parameter fix everything? Yes, it seems like that would work. A much better solution than my va_copy kludge, actually.
