On Monday, 22. August 2011 02:02:24 un dead wrote: > If I made a patch that used doxygen style comments plus a Doxyfile, > would it have a chance of getting accepted? The current comments > aren't useful if you want to generate documentation. > > Additionally, the way the functions are laid out, it's harder to grep > for functions. You have to use ctags or something like that because > not every function has a header.
Personally I'm no big fan of automatically generated documentation. And it only makes sense if you start off your project using these doxygen guidelines to begin with. A patch would leave no piece of code untouched, this is a nightmare from the point of view of someone who regularly merges ioquake3 changes to his project. I say don't bother. -- Thilo Schulz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
