Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > I know you probably react the same way as I, when I hear someone > talking about an “open IoT Platform” because most of the time it means > one company wants the rest of the world to use their platform.
Agreed!
One of the key technologies which seems to lock things into a specific
vertical (and into cloud connected devices, rather than m2m IoT) is the
onboarding technology used.
draft-ietf-anima-bootstrap-keyinfra is past IETF LC, should be RFC by the end
of the year. It's not ideal for every situation, and there are a number of
other technologies that fill in most of the gaps.
> At least it has been this way for almost all the “open-platform”
> discussion rounds I have attended (and there were quite a lot of them.
As an open source developer, I like to repeat that it's not the open source
that makes a platform open, but the open standard.
> Lat week I was invited to a Kick-Off event from a group called
> “Industry Business Network 4.0 e.V.” (This is a German “registered
> association”)
Interesting.
> This is a group of mid-sized companies building production machinery
> and/or running production machinery, which are very unsatisfied with
> the existing initiatives (mostly commercial)
Very interesting.
> Just thought I’d post this here as it does involve the full stack of
> Apache goodness and perhaps others would like to participate.
> Industry Business Network 4.0 e.V. website:
https://industry-business-network.org/en
> Here the link to the IndustryFusion project website:
https://www.industry-fusion.com/en/
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
