Ossama,
We are all good here also. The data point is good. Even if we remove the requirement from the core stack, we should be able to continue to support your scenarios as currently defined and designed. Pat From: Morrow, Joseph L Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 4:53 PM To: Othman, Ossama; Lankswert, Patrick Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: [dev] glib Just adding a quick note.. Hi Pat, On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Lankswert, Patrick <patrick.lankswert at intel.com <mailto:patrick.lankswert at intel.com> > wrote: Ossama, I am not sure that your case justifies making glib a requirement for the entire stack on multi-threaded systems. I wasn't trying to justify making glib a requirement, and was merely answering your question about other uses of glib. Personally, I'd like to see the glib dependency removed as well; although doing so will cause me some grief with respect the code I'm currently working on. Correct me if I am wrong, but this will only for linux which will have glib already installed. I think it'll be hard to find a Linux distribution where glib isn't installed by default. :) Although ?glib-2.0? may already be installed with linux distributions, we require the need to install the ?libglib-2.0-dev? package which includes headers as well. -Ossama -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150414/596e1521/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 7198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150414/596e1521/attachment.p7s>
