On Wednesday 22 April 2015 20:06:57 Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Just continue doing these with strings? UUIDs of course also work, but may
> be less useful in debugging as wireshark won't know them for the custom
> case.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 22.04.2015, at 20:03, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > How would you propose for custom extensions?
So let's say we are encoding in some limited format that requires strings only
for keys (say, JSON), we'd have:
{"0":"/a/light","1":["123":true,"extensionname":"#123456"]}
Is that what you'd propose?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
