On 02/02/2015 04:48 PM, Keane, Erich wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 16:46 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Sudarshan wrote: >>> My suggestion is to wait for the connectivity-abstraction branch to be >>> merged with master and then do these changes. Otherwise, it will add >>> complexity in merging those two branches. >> >> Agreed. The fewer branches outstanding, the smaller the surface. >> >> That said, should we begin using the new style for any new code? >> > > I don't think we should diverge names, that would just be confusing. I > would suggest sticking to where we are for now, and doing all the name > changes in a single patch.
Yes, merging with names changed on one side is a huge pain. It also helps to keep names consistent within a given branch. I've been bitten by both these issues too many times over the years.
