I just pushed a review that should fix this (1430).  Let me know if that
fixes it for you.

Thanks,
Erich


On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 16:32 +0000, Keane, Erich wrote:
> Yep, we're still working through the review process on a workaround and
> trying to decide if it is the right fix.  I'll respond to this thread
> when we have something.
> 
> Thanks,
> Erich
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 01:06 +0000, ??? wrote:
> > Hi. Erich,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > What's going on the changes for contructResourceObject()? Any commit
> > for this has not been merged yet. 
> > 
> > Please inform me if it is done.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > BR, Jihun Ha.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > ------- Original Message -------
> > 
> > Sender : Keane, Erich<erich.keane at intel.com>
> > 
> > Date : 2015-06-26 06:52 (GMT+09:00)
> > 
> > Title : Re: [dev] constructResourceObject() function does not work
> > well
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > After further consideration and discussion, I believe that exposing
> > the
> > OCDevAddr at the C++ level for the first time wouldn't be the best
> > idea.
> > I'm thinking we'd be better off just making host return a valid,
> > routable string in OCResource, then make OCResource properly hand that
> > down, which should fix this up.
> > 
> > John Light has agreed to contribute a patch for this, so feel free to
> > contact him if you wish to help or have a conflict.
> > 
> > Thanks all!
> > -Erich
> > 
> > On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 18:01 +0000, Keane, Erich wrote:
> > > The issue seems to be that the port isn't properly being set in the
> > > constructResourceObject.  Previously, this was included in the
> > 'host'
> > > string, but it seems that it isn't anymore, so we are attempting to
> > > connect to an endpoint on port 0!
> > > 
> > > It seems that we might need to re-imagine this function a little to
> > be
> > > more consistent with this change.  
> > > 
> > > The solution might be to take a OCDevAddr object as a parameter
> > rather
> > > than the 'host', since it seems to have superceded it.  This would
> > > require OCResource to make this accessible as well.  This would also
> > > have the added benefit of allowing interface selection.
> > > 
> > > Let me think over a solution (or others, please contribute thoughts
> > or
> > > patches!), and I'll get this fixed when I get a chance.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for finding this!
> > > 
> > > -Erich
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 16:21 +0000, Keane, Erich wrote:
> > > > That has worked in the past, but I'm not sure if it has been since
> > > > broken.  If I get a chance today, I'll take a look.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:13 +0000, ??? wrote:
> > > > > Hi. All,
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm trying to use constructResourceObject() function to make
> > temporal
> > > > > OCResource object to send a GET request to a certain resource
> > server.
> > > > > 
> > > > > But it looks like that it does not work well. I've tested with
> > > > > fridgeclient/fridgeserver sample applications, which fails.
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > For instance, in fridgeclient application, it tries to create
> > > > > OCResource object for leftdoor and send a GET request with the
> > > > > OCResource object. But, the response does not come.
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > Anyone who knows what the problem is?
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > ?????. ??? ??.
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jihun Ha (???/???, Ph.D.)
> > > > > 
> > > > > IoT, IoTivity, OIC | IoT Solution Lab
> > > > > 
> > > > > Software R&D Center | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mobile +82 10 2533 7947  
> > > > > 
> > > > > jihun.ha at samsung.com | jhha85 at gmail.com 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > iotivity-dev mailing list
> > > > > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> > > > > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > iotivity-dev mailing list
> > > > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> > > > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > iotivity-dev mailing list
> > > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> > > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > ?????. ??? ??.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Jihun Ha (???/???, Ph.D.)
> > 
> > IoT, IoTivity, OIC | IoT Solution Lab
> > 
> > Software R&D Center | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
> > 
> > Mobile +82 10 2533 7947  
> > 
> > jihun.ha at samsung.com | jhha85 at gmail.com 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iotivity-dev mailing list
> iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Reply via email to