+IoTivity-Infrastructure Mailing List -----Original Message----- From: Jon A. Cruz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:40 AM To: Morrow, Joseph L; Lankswert, Patrick; Macieira, Thiago; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] GCC/G++ Version
Odd, I didn't see such a request, and would have commented. I've seen this issue before, and almost without fail it introduces problems for a project. Can we get back at least one jenkins validation build using gcc 4.6? Keeping one with 4.8 also would be handy, but without a 4.6 one running things will build up time-killing issues over and over. We can't really afford that. And if it comes down to just issues regarding writing tests, developers can contact me directly for help. I feel keeping good tests going is critical for project velocity and have worked extensively in the past to help others with such. Thanks! On 07/23/2015 08:56 AM, Morrow, Joseph L wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > It appears that when using Google Test, the "override" feature in C++11 > brought in with 4.8 is used. It appears when you disable the builds for all > the unit tests in Resource Manipulation and build with 4.6 that all the > errors go away and it just builds right. So it appears the bump was a request > to support C++11 features in Unit Tests only. > > Thanks, > > Joey > > -----Original Message----- > From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org > [mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of > Lankswert, Patrick > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:26 AM > To: Macieira, Thiago; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > Subject: Re: [dev] GCC/G++ Version > > Thiago, > > This also highlights a breakdown between maintainers. We really need some > consistent behaviors regarding tool chain, tool set, dependency, dependency > versions. The maintainers are not properly vetting changes in these areas. > With limited to no pushback, the message is not making it to the contributors > to ask before changing. These capricious changes that impact the entire > community are very frustrating and possibly chilling. > > Pat > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev- >> bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira >> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 8:22 PM >> To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org >> Subject: Re: [dev] GCC/G++ Version >> >> On Wednesday 22 July 2015 23:26:43 Morrow, Joseph L wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It has come to my attention that the GCC/G++ Compiler Version has >>> been bumped from 4.6.1 to 4.8 in recent days. This was done by >>> contributors for the Resource-Manipulation module. My question is >>> regarding Tizen >>> 2.3 and it's dependency on the GCC/G++ Compiler Version 4.6.1. Is >>> this still a supported platform as of Tizen 2.3? I see there is a >>> Tizen 3.0 which supports up to compiler 4.9.2. >> >> What did they need from 4.8 that they couldn't use 4.6 for? >> >> -- >> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com >> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center >> >> _______________________________________________ >> iotivity-dev mailing list >> iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org >> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > -- Jon A. Cruz - Senior Open Source Developer Samsung Open Source Group jonc at osg.samsung.com
