Jon,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev-
> bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Jon A. Cruz
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 2:12 PM
> To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] Fwd: Re: Re: [Request for feedback] IoTivity 0.9.1
Release
> Schedule & Feature
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/24/2015 06:38 AM, Lankswert, Patrick wrote:
> > June and Thiago,
> >
> > BTW, test engineering has been very aggressive in ramping. They have
> > already started automated testing on the CA branch. Someone from test
> > engineering should speak to the results to date. However, there are
> > blocks of tests that work on master that do not work on the CA branch.
> > The biggest set are "ACK request" (confirmable) which is still not
> > supported in the CA.
> >
> > So, this is the order of delivery:
> >
> > 1)      Feature complete
> >
> > 2)      Fully reviewed
> >
> > 3)      Unit tested (not system tests)
> >
> > 4)      Acceptable (meaning good enough) testing engineering report
> >
> > 5)      Ready to merge
> >
> 
> 
> In my experience projects complete much quicker when unit testing is done
> as part of the initial coding, or at least immediately before review.
System
> testing can be added later, but the developer initially coding some aspect
of
> the feature can most quickly and effectively write tests for code when
that
> code is still fresh in their mind.
> 
> if IoTivity is going to be holding to aggressive scheduling, then we
should
> really look at different ways to ramp up the unit testing. Then the
question of
> pushing for more Test Driven Development (TDD) practices might also be
> examined.

Of course, you are right. I should not have said delivery. This is the order
of my checklist. I look for the review first, because it may change code
that can break a unit test. And, any code change as a result of failure in
unit testing or validation sends you back to review.

Pat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 7198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150324/f5f86c76/attachment.p7s>

Reply via email to